Nate Paul present in contempt of courtroom, fined, ordered to serve jail time

Join The Transient, The Texas Tribune’s every day e-newsletter that retains readers up to the mark on essentially the most important Texas information.

Nate Paul, an Austin actual property investor who was central to allegations of unlawful conduct by Texas Lawyer Normal Ken Paxton, has been present in contempt of courtroom, fined greater than $180,000 and ordered to serve jail time by a state choose in Travis County.

In October 2020, prime deputies in Paxton’s company informed federal authorities that they believed the legal professional normal misused his authority to learn Paul, a buddy and marketing campaign donor. These eight prime deputies have been fired or resigned, however their allegations spurred an FBI investigation into Paxton that’s now being led by the U.S. Division of Justice.

Paxton and Paul have denied the allegations, which have been have been detailed in a whistleblower lawsuit by 4 former Paxton deputies who claimed they have been improperly fired in retaliation for reporting their suspicions to investigators.

The court-ordered sanctions in opposition to Paul got here in a lawsuit between the actual property developer and The Roy F. & Joann Cole Mitte Basis, an Austin-based nonprofit that sued Paul for fraud.

Ray Chester, an legal professional for the Mitte Basis, stated his shoppers have been happy by the choice from state District Decide Jan Soifer, which was revealed in a letter despatched Friday to attorneys for Paul and Mitte.

“We really feel vindicated by the choice,” Chester stated, calling it “one of many steps to getting justice.”

Brent Perry, Paul’s legal professional, stated Monday he disagreed with the courtroom’s choice and can work to keep away from entry of the order and to “shield Mr. Paul’s pursuits if and when the order is entered.”

In keeping with the whistleblower lawsuit, Paxton overrode a call by his company’s Charitable Belief Division and directed the legal professional normal’s workplace to intervene within the Mitte Basis lawsuit in opposition to Paul. “It was odd, contemplating that (Paxton) had by no means carried out so earlier than and even proven any curiosity in a charity case,” the lawsuit stated.

The whistleblowers additionally alleged that Paxton helped Paul achieve entry to investigative paperwork associated to 2019 searches of Paul’s residence and enterprise by federal and state investigators. Paul argued the searches have been improper, however after company attorneys decided that the declare was with out benefit, Paxton went past regular procedures to make sure that an out of doors counsel was employed to analyze, the whistleblowers alleged.

As well as, Paxton ordered a written opinion that was revealed at 2 a.m. on a Sunday stating that foreclosures gross sales needed to be suspended beneath pandemic security guidelines, which benefited Paul by delaying a foreclosures sale for one in every of his properties two days later, in keeping with the whistleblowers.

In return, the whistleblowers stated, Paul gave Paxton a $25,000 marketing campaign donation, paid to rework his residence and employed Paxton’s mistress. Paxton is married to state Sen. Angela Paxton, R-McKinney.

In keeping with a Friday letter despatched by a employees legal professional for Soifer, the choose discovered Paul in civil and felony contempt, concluding that he had provided false testimony. He was ordered to serve 10 days in jail starting March 15.

“Mr. Paul’s flagrant lies to the Courtroom whereas beneath oath have been pervasive and inexcusable, and served to intentionally thwart the capabilities of the Courtroom in implementing its injunction,” Elliott Beck, a employees legal professional for Soifer, wrote within the letter.

Beck added that Paul’s actions have been “a part of a sample of non-compliance with courtroom orders.” Paul was fined $181,760 for violating the courtroom order.

Final June, in an try to pressure Paul to pay the Mitte Basis a $2 million judgment the nonprofit had received in opposition to him, Soifer issued an injunction ordering Paul to make month-to-month expenditure reviews to the courtroom and barring him from spending greater than $25,000 at a time.

Paul didn’t file reviews for 5 months, Chester stated, and the Mitte Basis requested Soifer to carry him in contempt. In a November listening to, the nonprofit’s attorneys argued that Paul had paid about $960,000 to Westlake Industries, an organization Paul owns, and $100,000 to Avery Bradley, a former College of Texas and NBA basketball participant who had filed a breach of contract lawsuit in opposition to Paul’s agency, World Class Holdings.

The nonprofit’s attorneys confronted Paul together with his financial institution data exhibiting the $100,000 switch to Bradley, which Paul stated he didn’t acknowledge. Soifer then recessed the listening to for per week to present Paul time to collect financial institution data and determine all of his financial institution accounts, which the courtroom stated he did not do.

The nonprofit’s attorneys have been in a position to receive financial institution data for Westlake Industries, which confirmed a $967,000 cost on the day the injunction went into impact.

“The timing was actually suspicious, and he owns 100% of Westlake Industries,” Chester stated.

In his letter, Beck stated Paul “provided false testimony, committing perjury, sitting within the witness field just some ft away from the Courtroom, in responding to a number of questions by counsel and the Courtroom.”

“He lied about each transfers referenced above and he lied about his private financial institution accounts, even when confronted with proof of such accounts,” Beck wrote. “He failed and refused to provide paperwork of such accounts, even after the listening to was recessed for per week to present him time to collect such paperwork.”

Perry stated he didn’t agree that the courtroom’s order required Paul to report the $960,000 switch or that Paul lied in reference to the 2 transactions the courtroom cited. He additionally stated these transfers didn’t have an effect on the Mitte Basis’s capability to gather on the judgment, ought to the inspiration win its ongoing courtroom case.

Chester stated he’s at present drafting the violation order at Soifer’s course.

The Mitte Basis first invested part of its endowment in Paul’s corporations in 2011. The nonprofit later sued Paul for breach of contract for failing to make monetary disclosures.

Via one in every of Paul’s corporations, the Mitte Basis holds half possession in two downtown Austin buildings which might be beneath contract on the market for a mixed $172 million, of which the Mitte Basis would get a “significant slice,” in keeping with Chester. The shut of the sale was delayed by a Paul enchantment, which was just lately denied by the Austin-based third Courtroom of Appeals, although Paul’s attorneys have a number of months to hunt evaluation by the Texas Supreme Courtroom.